https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408623 Restoration of a complaint dismissed at the pre-summoning stage for non-appearance was treated as a procedural matter that did not decide the merits or cause prejudice to the opposite side. The revisional court's acceptance of the explanation for delay in filing the revision petition, along with the imposition of costs and conditions, was found to be a proper exercise of discretion. In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act supported continuation of the complaint for consideration on merits, and no perversity was shown to justify interference in inherent jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408623 Restoration of a complaint dismissed at the pre-summoning stage for non-appearance was treated as a procedural matter that did not decide the merits or cause prejudice to the opposite side. The revisional court's acceptance of the explanation for delay in filing the revision petition, along with the imposition of costs and conditions, was found to be a proper exercise of discretion. In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act supported continuation of the complaint for consideration on merits, and no perversity was shown to justify interference in inherent jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408623