<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 498 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408602</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the company&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D by considering only the value of investments yielding exempt income for the average investment value. This decision aligns with established precedents, offering clarity on disallowance calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 498 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408602</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the company&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D by considering only the value of investments yielding exempt income for the average investment value. This decision aligns with established precedents, offering clarity on disallowance calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>