<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 83 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25693</link>
    <description>In applying section 23A(1), the reasonableness of non-declaration of dividend had to be judged from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, taking the overall financial position into account. Past commercial losses were relevant and reserves were not to be set off against those losses merely to deny the reasonableness of withholding dividend. Contingent liabilities also formed part of the financial assessment and could justify non-declaration where the company had sustained losses and faced substantial liabilities. The tax authority could not substitute its own business judgment for that of the directors, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:15:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 83 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25693</link>
      <description>In applying section 23A(1), the reasonableness of non-declaration of dividend had to be judged from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, taking the overall financial position into account. Past commercial losses were relevant and reserves were not to be set off against those losses merely to deny the reasonableness of withholding dividend. Contingent liabilities also formed part of the financial assessment and could justify non-declaration where the company had sustained losses and faced substantial liabilities. The tax authority could not substitute its own business judgment for that of the directors, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>