<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295693</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer. The court held that the reassessment notice under section 148 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to demonstrate any non-disclosure of material facts by the appellant during the original assessment. Consequently, the addition of alleged excess depreciation was disallowed, providing relief to the appellant in the case concerning the assessment year 2008-09 under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295693</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer. The court held that the reassessment notice under section 148 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to demonstrate any non-disclosure of material facts by the appellant during the original assessment. Consequently, the addition of alleged excess depreciation was disallowed, providing relief to the appellant in the case concerning the assessment year 2008-09 under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>