<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1512 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295703</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the rejection of a refund claim for not being filed online as mandated. Emphasizing the timely submission of returns and absence of irregularities, the court directed the claims to be promptly processed for refund issuance, highlighting the need to prioritize claim substance over procedural technicalities to prevent unjust denials based on formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1512 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295703</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the rejection of a refund claim for not being filed online as mandated. Emphasizing the timely submission of returns and absence of irregularities, the court directed the claims to be promptly processed for refund issuance, highlighting the need to prioritize claim substance over procedural technicalities to prevent unjust denials based on formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>