<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 48 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25685</link>
    <description>Gifts routed through named recipients were treated as indirect transfers to the intended beneficiaries where the record showed they were links in the same chain, supported by common causation and motivation. On that factual basis, the transfers were not viewed as independent gifts to the named recipients but as transfers to the real beneficiaries, making them includible in the assessees&#039; net wealth under section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 48 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25685</link>
      <description>Gifts routed through named recipients were treated as indirect transfers to the intended beneficiaries where the record showed they were links in the same chain, supported by common causation and motivation. On that factual basis, the transfers were not viewed as independent gifts to the named recipients but as transfers to the real beneficiaries, making them includible in the assessees&#039; net wealth under section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>