https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295687 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to allow the respondents' writ petitions seeking regularization of their services due to a flawed selection process for Class IV employees. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial precedents, highlighting that participating in a flawed selection process did not entitle the respondents to claim regularization based on a different premise. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in selection processes and the binding nature of court judgments. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295687 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to allow the respondents' writ petitions seeking regularization of their services due to a flawed selection process for Class IV employees. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial precedents, highlighting that participating in a flawed selection process did not entitle the respondents to claim regularization based on a different premise. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in selection processes and the binding nature of court judgments. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295687