https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408574 The court directed the petitioner to submit the notarised affidavit and deposit the court-fee within three days. The petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity of certain sections of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act was noted, along with the dismissal of a similar petition by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. A discrepancy in the petitioner's residential address was observed. The court decided to proceed with further examination of the case after considering the previous order and advised the petitioner to seek relief from the High Court. The matter was listed for future proceedings. en-us Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408574 The court directed the petitioner to submit the notarised affidavit and deposit the court-fee within three days. The petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity of certain sections of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act was noted, along with the dismissal of a similar petition by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. A discrepancy in the petitioner's residential address was observed. The court decided to proceed with further examination of the case after considering the previous order and advised the petitioner to seek relief from the High Court. The matter was listed for future proceedings. Case-Laws GST Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408574