<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 454 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings as void ab initio due to the absence of mentioning the failure on the part of the assessee in the reasons recorded by the ld. AO, following the High Court decision. The relief was granted to the assessee on the preliminary ground of invalid assumption of jurisdiction u/s.147 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal refrained from giving an opinion on the merits, leaving them open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:50:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 454 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings as void ab initio due to the absence of mentioning the failure on the part of the assessee in the reasons recorded by the ld. AO, following the High Court decision. The relief was granted to the assessee on the preliminary ground of invalid assumption of jurisdiction u/s.147 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal refrained from giving an opinion on the merits, leaving them open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>