<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 447 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of penalty under Section 271G of the IT Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The decision was based on the principles of natural justice and lack of prejudice to the Revenue due to the non-filing of documents before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of providing essential details in penalty notices and considering reasonable causes for non-compliance with document filing requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 447 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of penalty under Section 271G of the IT Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The decision was based on the principles of natural justice and lack of prejudice to the Revenue due to the non-filing of documents before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of providing essential details in penalty notices and considering reasonable causes for non-compliance with document filing requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>