<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1624 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295671</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 42,06,250/- made by the AO under Section 68 for alleged bogus LTCG. The tribunal determined that the transactions were genuine, supported by documentary evidence, and conducted through recognized stock exchanges. The decision upheld principles of natural justice and aligned with previous judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1624 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295671</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 42,06,250/- made by the AO under Section 68 for alleged bogus LTCG. The tribunal determined that the transactions were genuine, supported by documentary evidence, and conducted through recognized stock exchanges. The decision upheld principles of natural justice and aligned with previous judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>