<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1837 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the assessment of capital gains in the hands of the respective HUFs involved in the transaction. The Tribunal held that the sale proceeds of the property cannot be assessed in the hands of late A.R.Pandurangan HUF, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment order and rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the exemption under section 54F.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1837 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the assessment of capital gains in the hands of the respective HUFs involved in the transaction. The Tribunal held that the sale proceeds of the property cannot be assessed in the hands of late A.R.Pandurangan HUF, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment order and rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the exemption under section 54F.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>