<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1233 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295664</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the ld CIT(A) order and directed the AO to verify if the HUF had been taxed for the capital gains on the land. If so, the tax on the individual assessee should be deleted. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1233 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295664</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the ld CIT(A) order and directed the AO to verify if the HUF had been taxed for the capital gains on the land. If so, the tax on the individual assessee should be deleted. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>