https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295677 Quashing of an FIR under Section 482 CrPC was held premature where the investigation was still incomplete. The Court noted that recovery of a large cash amount from an accused's house and the explanation for its source were matters requiring investigation, not final assessment at the quashing stage. Because the allegations and surrounding circumstances disclosed sufficient material to allow the probe to continue, the High Court should not have entered into the merits before the investigation reached its logical conclusion. The quashing order was unsustainable, and the FIR and investigation were restored. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:47:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295677 Quashing of an FIR under Section 482 CrPC was held premature where the investigation was still incomplete. The Court noted that recovery of a large cash amount from an accused's house and the explanation for its source were matters requiring investigation, not final assessment at the quashing stage. Because the allegations and surrounding circumstances disclosed sufficient material to allow the probe to continue, the High Court should not have entered into the merits before the investigation reached its logical conclusion. The quashing order was unsustainable, and the FIR and investigation were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295677