https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295674 Questions on insurance surplus computation, shareholder and policyholder account transfers, actuarial valuation disturbance, and the negative reserve issue were treated as covered by earlier decisions and therefore did not raise substantial questions of law under section 260A. The employee benefit provision issue was concluded against the Revenue by an Apex Court decision. Other proposed questions were either held not to arise from the Tribunal's order or were not entertained for lack of a substantial question of law. The appeal was admitted only on the remaining questions. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:47:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295674 Questions on insurance surplus computation, shareholder and policyholder account transfers, actuarial valuation disturbance, and the negative reserve issue were treated as covered by earlier decisions and therefore did not raise substantial questions of law under section 260A. The employee benefit provision issue was concluded against the Revenue by an Apex Court decision. Other proposed questions were either held not to arise from the Tribunal's order or were not entertained for lack of a substantial question of law. The appeal was admitted only on the remaining questions. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295674