https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408531 Section 45 PMLA's twin bail conditions remained inapplicable to anticipatory bail applications after the 2018 amendment because changing the provision's opening words did not validly revive conditions previously declared unconstitutional. Revival required valid re-enactment of the struck-down conditions or retrospective validating legislation. Anticipatory bail could nevertheless be refused where allegations disclosed a serious economic offence involving layered transactions and a detailed money trail, and custodial interrogation remained necessary to determine the full extent of transactions and the applicants' roles. Pre-arrest protection was therefore declined due to the gravity of the allegations and investigative requirements. en-us Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:08:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408531 Section 45 PMLA's twin bail conditions remained inapplicable to anticipatory bail applications after the 2018 amendment because changing the provision's opening words did not validly revive conditions previously declared unconstitutional. Revival required valid re-enactment of the struck-down conditions or retrospective validating legislation. Anticipatory bail could nevertheless be refused where allegations disclosed a serious economic offence involving layered transactions and a detailed money trail, and custodial interrogation remained necessary to determine the full extent of transactions and the applicants' roles. Pre-arrest protection was therefore declined due to the gravity of the allegations and investigative requirements. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408531