<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to restrict the addition to Rs. 1,50,000. The Tribunal emphasized the need for credible evidence to substantiate claims of cash deposits and the proper application of section 44AF for presumptive taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to restrict the addition to Rs. 1,50,000. The Tribunal emphasized the need for credible evidence to substantiate claims of cash deposits and the proper application of section 44AF for presumptive taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>