https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408517 The Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Enforcement Directorate through the Assistant Director under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the Enforcement Directorate, as a specialized financial investigating agency, had the locus to file an appeal despite the Act designating only the Director to do so. The Court emphasized the pragmatic approach under the Act, allowing entities like the Enforcement Directorate to challenge orders affecting the Act's objectives. The appeal was dismissed, and the Enforcement Directorate's competence to file an appeal through the Assistant Director was affirmed. en-us Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:46:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408517 The Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Enforcement Directorate through the Assistant Director under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the Enforcement Directorate, as a specialized financial investigating agency, had the locus to file an appeal despite the Act designating only the Director to do so. The Court emphasized the pragmatic approach under the Act, allowing entities like the Enforcement Directorate to challenge orders affecting the Act's objectives. The appeal was dismissed, and the Enforcement Directorate's competence to file an appeal through the Assistant Director was affirmed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408517