<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 398 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding alleged wrongful Cenvat credit availment on capital goods. The appellant&#039;s failure to rectify irregular credit availment from previous years and lack of evidence on reversing double benefits led to the decision. Despite citing case law, the Tribunal deemed it inapplicable, emphasizing compliance with Cenvat credit rules and prevention of double benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 398 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding alleged wrongful Cenvat credit availment on capital goods. The appellant&#039;s failure to rectify irregular credit availment from previous years and lack of evidence on reversing double benefits led to the decision. Despite citing case law, the Tribunal deemed it inapplicable, emphasizing compliance with Cenvat credit rules and prevention of double benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>