<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 388 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408492</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to exclude mutual funds not yielding exempt income from disallowance calculation under Sec. 14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii). Additionally, the AO was instructed to reevaluate the addition of &amp;amp;8377;13,758 to the assessee&#039;s income based on Form 26AS, providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 388 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408492</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to exclude mutual funds not yielding exempt income from disallowance calculation under Sec. 14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii). Additionally, the AO was instructed to reevaluate the addition of &amp;amp;8377;13,758 to the assessee&#039;s income based on Form 26AS, providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>