<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1853 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295629</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not sustainable due to the lack of a specific finding by the Assessing Officer regarding whether it was imposed for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty order was deemed inconsistent and unsustainable, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1853 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295629</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not sustainable due to the lack of a specific finding by the Assessing Officer regarding whether it was imposed for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty order was deemed inconsistent and unsustainable, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>