<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295626</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court extended the time for pre-deposit by two weeks for appellants in a Central Excise Act case. Shree Nakoda Ispat Ltd. and Anant Dave complied, but Kailash Agarwal failed to deposit the directed amount, leading to the rejection of his appeal by the Tribunal for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295626</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court extended the time for pre-deposit by two weeks for appellants in a Central Excise Act case. Shree Nakoda Ispat Ltd. and Anant Dave complied, but Kailash Agarwal failed to deposit the directed amount, leading to the rejection of his appeal by the Tribunal for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>