<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1857 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295637</link>
    <description>Allegations arising from a colony-development dispute over external and infrastructure development charges, collection before approval, and alleged licence violations were examined under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. The Court noted that the special statutory regime governed the field, including contraventions of licence conditions and prosecution with previous sanction of the competent authority. On that basis, the materials did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating or criminal breach of trust under the IPC, and no specific role was attributed to the petitioners as directors. The absence of previous sanction rendered the criminal proceedings unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1857 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295637</link>
      <description>Allegations arising from a colony-development dispute over external and infrastructure development charges, collection before approval, and alleged licence violations were examined under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. The Court noted that the special statutory regime governed the field, including contraventions of licence conditions and prosecution with previous sanction of the competent authority. On that basis, the materials did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating or criminal breach of trust under the IPC, and no specific role was attributed to the petitioners as directors. The absence of previous sanction rendered the criminal proceedings unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>