<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1380 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295634</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the previous orders and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reevaluation. The Court emphasized the need for justification in differential treatment regarding the waiver of pre-deposit, considering the appellant&#039;s status as a Commission Agent. The Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the issue of undue hardship and the previous waiver granted to the appellant. As a result, the Court allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1380 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295634</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the previous orders and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reevaluation. The Court emphasized the need for justification in differential treatment regarding the waiver of pre-deposit, considering the appellant&#039;s status as a Commission Agent. The Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the issue of undue hardship and the previous waiver granted to the appellant. As a result, the Court allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>