https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295624 Official records and the presumption of regular performance were treated as sufficient to meet the sanction requirement under Section 196A CrPC, and the objection failed. For cheating under Sections 417 and 420 IPC, dishonest inducement through forged or tampered railway receipts and unlawful gain were enough, without separate proof of actual pecuniary loss in every case. On the evidence, cheating was sustained against Tulsi Ram and Beni Gopal, while Babu Lal obtained relief; conspiracy under Section 120B IPC was upheld against the family appellants except Chandrika Singh, whose conviction was set aside. Sentences were reduced and modified in light of delay and circumstances. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:13:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295624 Official records and the presumption of regular performance were treated as sufficient to meet the sanction requirement under Section 196A CrPC, and the objection failed. For cheating under Sections 417 and 420 IPC, dishonest inducement through forged or tampered railway receipts and unlawful gain were enough, without separate proof of actual pecuniary loss in every case. On the evidence, cheating was sustained against Tulsi Ram and Beni Gopal, while Babu Lal obtained relief; conspiracy under Section 120B IPC was upheld against the family appellants except Chandrika Singh, whose conviction was set aside. Sentences were reduced and modified in light of delay and circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295624