<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 379 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408483</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the impugned orders dated 12.03.2021 and 31.01.2021. The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226, despite the availability of an alternate remedy, as the issue was previously adjudicated and facts were undisputed. The pending application was also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 379 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408483</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the impugned orders dated 12.03.2021 and 31.01.2021. The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226, despite the availability of an alternate remedy, as the issue was previously adjudicated and facts were undisputed. The pending application was also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>