https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408479 Heavy surety and bank guarantee conditions attached to bail in a GST prosecution were treated as permissible where the allegations involved a serious economic offence and a need to secure the accused's attendance and protect the investigation. The court noted that the petitioner had withdrawn an earlier revision before the Sessions Court and that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to bypass the ordinary statutory remedy. Because the impugned bail order was detailed, reasoned, and aimed at safeguarding the proceedings, the conditions were not found onerous, arbitrary, or illegal, and no interference was warranted. en-us Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408479 Heavy surety and bank guarantee conditions attached to bail in a GST prosecution were treated as permissible where the allegations involved a serious economic offence and a need to secure the accused's attendance and protect the investigation. The court noted that the petitioner had withdrawn an earlier revision before the Sessions Court and that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to bypass the ordinary statutory remedy. Because the impugned bail order was detailed, reasoned, and aimed at safeguarding the proceedings, the conditions were not found onerous, arbitrary, or illegal, and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws GST Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408479