<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 366 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408470</link>
    <description>Limited Scrutiny Assessment: The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding limited scrutiny under CASS for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessing Officer did not exceed jurisdiction by converting limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny without approval, leading to the rejection of the appellant&#039;s grounds of appeal.Rejection of Books of Accounts and Profit Estimation: The Tribunal supported the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of books of accounts and profit estimation at 8% of turnover due to discrepancies, despite the appellant&#039;s argument based on prior audited accounts showing lower profits.Treatment of Interest Income from Fixed Deposits: The Tribunal agreed with the CIT (A) that interest income from fixed deposits lacked a direct nexus to business activities, dismissing the appellant&#039;s claim for its consideration as business income.Estimation of Net Profit: The Tribunal adjusted the net profit estimation to 5% of gross total turnover, partially allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal based on historical profit percentages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:49:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 366 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408470</link>
      <description>Limited Scrutiny Assessment: The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding limited scrutiny under CASS for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessing Officer did not exceed jurisdiction by converting limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny without approval, leading to the rejection of the appellant&#039;s grounds of appeal.Rejection of Books of Accounts and Profit Estimation: The Tribunal supported the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of books of accounts and profit estimation at 8% of turnover due to discrepancies, despite the appellant&#039;s argument based on prior audited accounts showing lower profits.Treatment of Interest Income from Fixed Deposits: The Tribunal agreed with the CIT (A) that interest income from fixed deposits lacked a direct nexus to business activities, dismissing the appellant&#039;s claim for its consideration as business income.Estimation of Net Profit: The Tribunal adjusted the net profit estimation to 5% of gross total turnover, partially allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal based on historical profit percentages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>