<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 345 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Petitioner, a non-profit company, lacked standing to file a petition under Section 213 of the Companies Act, 2013, as it was not a member, creditor, or depositor of the Respondent Company. The Tribunal found the allegations of fraudulent activities and mismanagement to be unsupported and noted the Petitioner&#039;s history of unsuccessful litigation in other courts. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the adverse orders from various courts against the Petitioner, concluding that it engaged in speculative and vexatious litigation. As a result, the petition was dismissed, and pending applications were deemed moot, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 345 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Petitioner, a non-profit company, lacked standing to file a petition under Section 213 of the Companies Act, 2013, as it was not a member, creditor, or depositor of the Respondent Company. The Tribunal found the allegations of fraudulent activities and mismanagement to be unsupported and noted the Petitioner&#039;s history of unsuccessful litigation in other courts. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the adverse orders from various courts against the Petitioner, concluding that it engaged in speculative and vexatious litigation. As a result, the petition was dismissed, and pending applications were deemed moot, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>