<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1612 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295607</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning disputed Cenvat Credit on imported inputs and capital goods. The Customs Authorities had not bifurcated the CVD and Cess amounts in the Bills of Entry, leading to the conclusion that the Cenvat Credit availed was in accordance with the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Member highlighted compliance with relevant statutory provisions and permitted importers to claim Cenvat Credit against the amount debited in the Duty Entitlement Passbook Script. Consequently, the impugned order disallowing the Cenvat Credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1612 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295607</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning disputed Cenvat Credit on imported inputs and capital goods. The Customs Authorities had not bifurcated the CVD and Cess amounts in the Bills of Entry, leading to the conclusion that the Cenvat Credit availed was in accordance with the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Member highlighted compliance with relevant statutory provisions and permitted importers to claim Cenvat Credit against the amount debited in the Duty Entitlement Passbook Script. Consequently, the impugned order disallowing the Cenvat Credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>