<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1509 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295613</link>
    <description>Where the tax effect was below the usual monetary limit for appeal maintainability, the Tribunal held that the matter fell within clause (e) of paragraph 3 of the amended CBDT circular dated 20.08.2018. On that basis, it found sufficient cause to recall its earlier order dated 21.08.2018. The miscellaneous application was therefore allowed, and the Revenue obtained recall of the prior order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:47:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1509 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295613</link>
      <description>Where the tax effect was below the usual monetary limit for appeal maintainability, the Tribunal held that the matter fell within clause (e) of paragraph 3 of the amended CBDT circular dated 20.08.2018. On that basis, it found sufficient cause to recall its earlier order dated 21.08.2018. The miscellaneous application was therefore allowed, and the Revenue obtained recall of the prior order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>