<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (3) TMI 144 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295591</link>
    <description>Offences arising from the same transaction may be joined in one trial, and the statutory limit on trying more than three offences of the same kind does not bar such joinder where the acts form a connected series. A conspiracy charge remains legally distinct from the substantive offences committed in pursuance of it, so it is not invalid merely because completed offences were also alleged. A Special Judge may try connected Indian Penal Code offences along with corruption offences when they are triable at the same trial under the Code. The question of sanction for conspiracy involving non-cognizable offences was noted, but left open for the trial stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (3) TMI 144 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295591</link>
      <description>Offences arising from the same transaction may be joined in one trial, and the statutory limit on trying more than three offences of the same kind does not bar such joinder where the acts form a connected series. A conspiracy charge remains legally distinct from the substantive offences committed in pursuance of it, so it is not invalid merely because completed offences were also alleged. A Special Judge may try connected Indian Penal Code offences along with corruption offences when they are triable at the same trial under the Code. The question of sanction for conspiracy involving non-cognizable offences was noted, but left open for the trial stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>