https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295583 In a cheque dishonour prosecution under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complaint need not be quashed for want of separate notices to each partner alleged to be in charge of the firm's business, because notice under Section 138(b) is required only to the drawer of the cheque and the complaint's allegations of responsibility may suffice to proceed. Disputed questions on whether a legally enforceable debt or liability exists, including issues relating to part-payments and the presumption under Section 139, are matters for evidence and cannot ordinarily be decided in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:44:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295583 In a cheque dishonour prosecution under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complaint need not be quashed for want of separate notices to each partner alleged to be in charge of the firm's business, because notice under Section 138(b) is required only to the drawer of the cheque and the complaint's allegations of responsibility may suffice to proceed. Disputed questions on whether a legally enforceable debt or liability exists, including issues relating to part-payments and the presumption under Section 139, are matters for evidence and cannot ordinarily be decided in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295583