<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition under section 68. The Tribunal dismissed other grounds not pressed by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and inquiry by the Assessing Officer. The decision was supported by judicial precedents confirming the genuineness of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition under section 68. The Tribunal dismissed other grounds not pressed by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and inquiry by the Assessing Officer. The decision was supported by judicial precedents confirming the genuineness of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>