https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295576 The court held that the notice addressed to the director/authorized signatory of the company was deemed as notice to the company itself, meeting the requirements of the law under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court applied the alter ego principle, attributing the knowledge of the director/authorized signatory to the company. As a result, the petitioner company was found to have received sufficient notice of the dishonor of the cheques, leading to the dismissal of the revision petitions and direction for the trial court to proceed with the case expeditiously. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:41:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295576 The court held that the notice addressed to the director/authorized signatory of the company was deemed as notice to the company itself, meeting the requirements of the law under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court applied the alter ego principle, attributing the knowledge of the director/authorized signatory to the company. As a result, the petitioner company was found to have received sufficient notice of the dishonor of the cheques, leading to the dismissal of the revision petitions and direction for the trial court to proceed with the case expeditiously. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295576