<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unexplained Cash Deposits Under Scrutiny: CIT(A) Misses Possible Opening Balance, Affecting Case u/s 69A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58306</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposit - CIT(A) when recorded that without borrowing or having opening cash balance, there is no way the cash deposits for the respective years can be explained through salary and by the assessee, missed the aspect of the assessee holding sufficient opening balance for the respective years. With this view of the matter we find it difficult to sustain the impugned orders. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:12:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:12:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unexplained Cash Deposits Under Scrutiny: CIT(A) Misses Possible Opening Balance, Affecting Case u/s 69A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58306</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposit - CIT(A) when recorded that without borrowing or having opening cash balance, there is no way the cash deposits for the respective years can be explained through salary and by the assessee, missed the aspect of the assessee holding sufficient opening balance for the respective years. With this view of the matter we find it difficult to sustain the impugned orders. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:12:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>