<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 425 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295568</link>
    <description>Super Time Scale posts in the Rajasthan Administrative Service were treated as the highest posts within the service structure because the rules used &quot;highest&quot; in its ordinary sense and linked it to government identification of posts under the scheme. Promotion to those posts was required to be made on merit alone under the specific rule governing highest posts, and the general promotion formula of seniority-cum-merit could not override that mandate. The interpretation therefore confirmed merit-only selection for the Super Time Scale posts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:02:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 425 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295568</link>
      <description>Super Time Scale posts in the Rajasthan Administrative Service were treated as the highest posts within the service structure because the rules used &quot;highest&quot; in its ordinary sense and linked it to government identification of posts under the scheme. Promotion to those posts was required to be made on merit alone under the specific rule governing highest posts, and the general promotion formula of seniority-cum-merit could not override that mandate. The interpretation therefore confirmed merit-only selection for the Super Time Scale posts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>