https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295566 A petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act could not be used to restrain termination of a determinable contract or to obtain, in substance, specific performance through injunction. A contract of that nature is not specifically enforceable, and the bar under the Specific Relief Act prevents indirect enforcement by interim relief aimed at restoring status quo or stopping takeover of the work. The proper remedy for an allegedly wrongful termination is compensation. The Section 9 application was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:07:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295566 A petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act could not be used to restrain termination of a determinable contract or to obtain, in substance, specific performance through injunction. A contract of that nature is not specifically enforceable, and the bar under the Specific Relief Act prevents indirect enforcement by interim relief aimed at restoring status quo or stopping takeover of the work. The proper remedy for an allegedly wrongful termination is compensation. The Section 9 application was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295566