https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408396 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed a Writ Petition challenging an order of demand passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax for non-compliance with Section 75 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The Court found that the petitioner was not given a personal hearing as required by Section 75(4) before the order was issued. Consequently, the Court set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of providing an opportunity for a personal hearing. The petitioner was granted one week to submit objections, and no costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408396 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed a Writ Petition challenging an order of demand passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax for non-compliance with Section 75 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The Court found that the petitioner was not given a personal hearing as required by Section 75(4) before the order was issued. Consequently, the Court set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of providing an opportunity for a personal hearing. The petitioner was granted one week to submit objections, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws GST Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408396