https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295551 The Court disposed of the Writ Petition challenging the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax's orders for direct recovery of interest under Section 50 of the GST Act. The Respondent clarified that the notifications were for interest payment due to late filing, not coercive recovery. The Court emphasized procedural compliance, digital signing validity, and the necessity of providing parties with a hearing opportunity before initiating recovery actions under the GST Act. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:24:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295551 The Court disposed of the Writ Petition challenging the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax's orders for direct recovery of interest under Section 50 of the GST Act. The Respondent clarified that the notifications were for interest payment due to late filing, not coercive recovery. The Court emphasized procedural compliance, digital signing validity, and the necessity of providing parties with a hearing opportunity before initiating recovery actions under the GST Act. Case-Laws GST Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295551