<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1388 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 43B of the Income Tax Act. It was established that the interest amount was genuinely paid from the Cash Credit/Overdraft account, distinguishing it from cases where conversion into a loan was not considered payment. The operational nature of the account and the actual payment of interest from the fluctuating balance led to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1388 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 43B of the Income Tax Act. It was established that the interest amount was genuinely paid from the Cash Credit/Overdraft account, distinguishing it from cases where conversion into a loan was not considered payment. The operational nature of the account and the actual payment of interest from the fluctuating balance led to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>