<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2801 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295559</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed because the tax effect was negligible, and the Court disposed of the matter on that ground alone. No substantive issue on central excise law was decided, as the order turned entirely on the low revenue implication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2801 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295559</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed because the tax effect was negligible, and the Court disposed of the matter on that ground alone. No substantive issue on central excise law was decided, as the order turned entirely on the low revenue implication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>