<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1708 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295558</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a Central Excise appeal because the tax effect was negligible, and the appeal was not entertained on that ground alone. The order does not address the merits of the excise dispute and reflects the practice of declining low-tax-effect litigation without entering into substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1708 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295558</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a Central Excise appeal because the tax effect was negligible, and the appeal was not entertained on that ground alone. The order does not address the merits of the excise dispute and reflects the practice of declining low-tax-effect litigation without entering into substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>