<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1527 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295556</link>
    <description>An appeal raising only questions of fact, without any substantial question of law, was found not entertainable. The Supreme Court examined the impugned judgment and held that the controversy depended on factual determinations alone, leaving no legal issue warranting appellate interference. On that basis, it declined to admit the appeal on merits and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1527 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295556</link>
      <description>An appeal raising only questions of fact, without any substantial question of law, was found not entertainable. The Supreme Court examined the impugned judgment and held that the controversy depended on factual determinations alone, leaving no legal issue warranting appellate interference. On that basis, it declined to admit the appeal on merits and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>