https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295553 Mere allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, or diversion of funds do not by themselves make a dispute non-arbitrable or invalidate an arbitration agreement; the exception applies only where the fraud vitiates the arbitration clause itself or raises a public-law controversy beyond inter partes claims. In enforcement of a foreign award, such disputes may justify interim protection where a strong prima facie case is shown and preservation is needed to avoid irreparable prejudice. On damages for fraudulent inducement and deceit, the proper measure is restitutio in integrum: the claimant is entitled to the full loss flowing from the transaction, including price paid and directly resulting consequential loss, rather than a narrow market-value differential. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295553 Mere allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, or diversion of funds do not by themselves make a dispute non-arbitrable or invalidate an arbitration agreement; the exception applies only where the fraud vitiates the arbitration clause itself or raises a public-law controversy beyond inter partes claims. In enforcement of a foreign award, such disputes may justify interim protection where a strong prima facie case is shown and preservation is needed to avoid irreparable prejudice. On damages for fraudulent inducement and deceit, the proper measure is restitutio in integrum: the claimant is entitled to the full loss flowing from the transaction, including price paid and directly resulting consequential loss, rather than a narrow market-value differential. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295553