https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295563 Under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court's role at the appointment stage is confined to a prima facie examination of whether an arbitration agreement exists. The 2015 amendment was understood as limiting pre-arbitral judicial interference and leaving preliminary objections such as accord and satisfaction, stale claims, and similar disputes to the arbitral tribunal. The contrary view in United India Insurance Company Limited was held to be incorrect and was overruled. The appeal was dismissed, and the law was clarified in favour of narrow scrutiny under Section 11(6A). en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295563 Under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court's role at the appointment stage is confined to a prima facie examination of whether an arbitration agreement exists. The 2015 amendment was understood as limiting pre-arbitral judicial interference and leaving preliminary objections such as accord and satisfaction, stale claims, and similar disputes to the arbitral tribunal. The contrary view in United India Insurance Company Limited was held to be incorrect and was overruled. The appeal was dismissed, and the law was clarified in favour of narrow scrutiny under Section 11(6A). Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295563