<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 899 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295537</link>
    <description>Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was held not to justify quashing complaints or stopping investigation at the threshold, because its bar is ordinarily examined when cognizance is taken, not before a criminal inquiry can proceed. The High Court had therefore acted prematurely in preventing investigation into serious allegations, and that order was set aside. The Court also held that a pending public interest petition and the inquiry directed in relation to a judicial scandal could not be terminated summarily before the materials were considered on merits, so the order setting aside that proceeding was likewise reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:45:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 899 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295537</link>
      <description>Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was held not to justify quashing complaints or stopping investigation at the threshold, because its bar is ordinarily examined when cognizance is taken, not before a criminal inquiry can proceed. The High Court had therefore acted prematurely in preventing investigation into serious allegations, and that order was set aside. The Court also held that a pending public interest petition and the inquiry directed in relation to a judicial scandal could not be terminated summarily before the materials were considered on merits, so the order setting aside that proceeding was likewise reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>