<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (5) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295534</link>
    <description>A wide arbitration clause covered disputes about withheld certification and sums allegedly due for work done, and the petition sufficiently stated the matters in difference for reference. The contractual requirement of prior written notice was treated as satisfied where the petition itself contained the dispute notice and was served before the reference order. Where the named arbitrator declined or was unable to act, the Court construed the statutory scheme liberally and held that it could direct filing of the agreement and appoint a substitute arbitrator to give effect to the arbitration agreement, while preserving the finality of the architect&#039;s decisions on matters excluded from arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:03:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (5) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295534</link>
      <description>A wide arbitration clause covered disputes about withheld certification and sums allegedly due for work done, and the petition sufficiently stated the matters in difference for reference. The contractual requirement of prior written notice was treated as satisfied where the petition itself contained the dispute notice and was served before the reference order. Where the named arbitrator declined or was unable to act, the Court construed the statutory scheme liberally and held that it could direct filing of the agreement and appoint a substitute arbitrator to give effect to the arbitration agreement, while preserving the finality of the architect&#039;s decisions on matters excluded from arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>