<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 265 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408369</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the rejection of the relaxation request under Article 14 of the Plant Quarantine Order, 2003, and remitted the matter for fumigation within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized the need for a one-time relaxation, considering the perishable nature of the goods and the petitioner&#039;s willingness to comply with fumigation requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 265 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408369</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the rejection of the relaxation request under Article 14 of the Plant Quarantine Order, 2003, and remitted the matter for fumigation within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized the need for a one-time relaxation, considering the perishable nature of the goods and the petitioner&#039;s willingness to comply with fumigation requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>