<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 261 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408365</link>
    <description>The court rejected the application for anticipatory bail, citing the applicant&#039;s evident involvement in the alleged offence based on investigation records and transcripts. Considering the gravity of the offence and legal precedents, anticipatory bail was denied, but interim protection was extended for one month for the applicant to seek recourse in a higher forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:10:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 261 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408365</link>
      <description>The court rejected the application for anticipatory bail, citing the applicant&#039;s evident involvement in the alleged offence based on investigation records and transcripts. Considering the gravity of the offence and legal precedents, anticipatory bail was denied, but interim protection was extended for one month for the applicant to seek recourse in a higher forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>